This post discusses a great article about death in simulation and the impact on learning. I’ve learned about the importance of this topic from @jameslhuffman, an ED physician with an interest in simulation. For those interested/involved in simulation, its importance is understated but probably moving forward we’ll hear more about. I highly recommend that anyone who is regularly running simulations or involved in medical simulation check out this paper. I’ll review some of the highlights below. This article follows the same topic that I wrote about a few weeks ago regarding the ethics (or impact of being unethical) of medical simulation.
The authors reviewed the literature for evidence about the impact of death during simulation and how it affects learners. I won’t discuss their methods as I really don’t think that’s the important message of the paper – it should be noted it’s simply a literature review rather than anything more detailed or comprehensive (e.g. systematic review or meta-analysis).
Who cares whether the simulated patient dies? Why does this even matter? These are two very reasonable questions and hopefully this review will help to shed some light on why some consideration should be made about the impact of the simulated patient’s life expectancy during the scenario!
The authors outline a few concerns that have been described regarding simulated death:
- Stressful situations including death may negatively affect learning and memory, as a result the scenario may not achieve its predefined learning objectives
- Death during simulation may instill negative feelings among learners about simulation (e.g. “every time I do a simulation, the patient dies…I don’t ever want to participate in that again!”)
- Death of a simulated patient may overtake the other objectives of the scenario and may occupy most of the debriefing
- Inability to maintain an environment of psychological safety – learners lose trust in the instructors if too many unexpected and difficult situations occur thus detracting from learning
I think all of these are very reasonable concerns and should be considered when designing a simulation scenario however, I don’t believe (nor do the authors of this review) that death in simulation should be abandoned. It clearly has a role as death in real life is inevitable and we should train and practice how to manage it. In addition, trainees must be exposed to scenarios where regardless of the therapies implemented the patient will inevitably die. This happens almost every day for clinicians involved in acute care medicine.
What I liked about this review is that the authors included some recommendations for educators to consider when designing a scenario.
First, they defined 3 types of simulated death:
- Death expected by both the facilitator & the learner – include discussion about end-of-life
- Death expected by the facilitator & unexpected learner – may include a planned respiratory arrest that the learner must attempt to manage
- Death unexpected by facilitator & the learner – this involves the learner administering a fatal drug or failing to recognize a fatal condition
Depending on what type of death occurs may dictate the implications for debriefing. The following are recommendations that the authors make based on a combination of evidence and experience but in general, they’re quite reasonable. In planning for a death during simulation here are some considerations:
- Ensure the instructor is prepared for the discussion
- Ensure the participants have a pre-briefing session that includes mention of the possibility that the simulated patient may die
- Simulated death should probably not be used with novice learners
- Scenarios for advanced learners should include simulated death if clinically appropriate
- Simulated death shouldn’t be used for punishment (e.g. death shouldn’t occur if a participant administers a noncritical drug) – death should only occur when the learner’s actions lead to a life-threatening consequence in real-life
- A de-briefing after a simulated death is essential – it must safely address the factors that led to the patient death with discussion about team dynamics & medical management
- Acknowledge participant emotions associated with death
In my opinion, most important however is simply to acknowledge that death during simulation isn’t without consequences. The impact on learners is relatively unknown given the lack of evidence. But we should consider how much stress we place on the learners as it may positively or negatively impact their learning.
Hopefully these considerations will be helpful in evaluating the sim patient’s life expectancy! I found it extremely useful and I acknowledge that the paper is better than any summary I can provide. Here’s the reference below for the article